Naff, Are We?
The Sunday Times – The high road to No10
On the face of it Gordon Brown’s speech on Britishness to the Fabian Society yesterday had much to commend it. …
Look deeper, however, and his motives seem a little less lofty. There is something a bit cynical about a Scot, knowing he is not the toast of Surrey, wrapping himself in the Union Jack to appeal to English voters. Setting up straw men to knock down does not make for intelligent debate either. Most people are quietly proud to be British; only a minority wince at the mention of empire. We do not fly the flag in our gardens because we are ashamed of it, but because it would be naff, aping the American habit.
Well, we only put up our flag on the Fourth of July, Memorial Day, and, uh, Veteran’s Day, I think. Dad would march us outside on a holiday morning with a brief lecture of what we were doing out there, which was good because otherwise we’d have had no idea. It was a day off school, for heaven’s sake. Why were we to care why? So I dunno how “naff” that makes me.
But allow me to finish the thought of the article:
Devolution for Scotland and Wales and its cackhanded failure in the English regions has given us an unbalanced Britain. Many of this government’s actions are profoundly un-British, from its failure to address the West Lothian question to its championing until recently of multiculturalism. Yet the knowledge tests it has introduced for naturalised citizens are utterly banal. The chancellor says the values on which Britishness is based “owe more to progressive ideas than to right-wing ones”. Who says? With apologies to Dr Johnson, when invited by Boswell to admire the striking prospect of a Scottish landscape: “Sir, the noblest prospect which the chancellor ever sees is the high road that leads him to No 10.”
Also in today’s Times, England is waking up to the patriot game, by Minette Marrin.
January 15th, 2006 at 8:48 pm
Having heard “naff” in years past being used by Brits to describe Aussies, I always assumed it was some sort of compliment, even if back-handed.
naff: British slang, describes something that is stupid, lame or unpalatable.
So, no, probably not.
January 15th, 2006 at 9:02 pm
Yeah, usually anytime they say anything slangy about Americans, it’s pretty much guaranteed to mean something along the lines of “stupid, lame, or unpalatable”.
But! On the upside, they have twee, and we don’t.
January 16th, 2006 at 12:53 am
Hmmm! Anglospherics ganging up angainst the Anglos in this blog. Be careful, or we’ll send Jack “Man of” Straw to sort you out….
January 16th, 2006 at 1:33 am
Can’t think of any British slang which expresses approval or admiration, we have to borrow all those from America. Lots of words – like naff – expressing contempt, though. Never heard “naff” used about Australia or Australians, though. Their cricket team’s too good. Ours is usually naff.
January 16th, 2006 at 1:35 am
Oh, and flying flags if you’re English (not Welsh or Scottish) is toe-curlingly-I’ve-lost-the-will-to-live-naff. Flags in Northern Ireland are a different thing altogether.
January 16th, 2006 at 3:04 am
Flags in Northern Ireland are a different thing altogether.
Isn’t that interesting though? Sometimes it takes an external threat to make us cherish our heritage and values. Of course the Northern Irish were looking in real danger there for some time.
We used to follow the Brits in thinking flying the flag was naff, but, as I mentioned in an earlier thread, that changed when one of our un-lamented former PMs (Keating) actually started talking about changing it. Suddenly flags sprouted up everywhere like daisies (my parents got a real big one and put it on a flag pole). He got the hint. The thing is, the flags have stayed up and people are proud to fly them now.
So, wait a bit while Gordo’s new found patriotism leaks off the headlines, then put up a big Union Jack. I think you’ll start a trend!
January 16th, 2006 at 3:17 am
“Anglospherics” – residents of the anglosphere. Sounds classy. Shall we adopt that, ninme?
January 16th, 2006 at 4:29 am
Flags is serious in NI. Phone-in producers fill aeons of airtime on the subject. One bloke’s parity of esteem is another bloke’s flaunting of the symbols of violence. Quite like the idea of a flagpole in the front garden. It can replace the tree that’s throwing its weight about. Think Steyn might have coined “Aglospherics”.
January 16th, 2006 at 4:30 am
Or even “Anglospherics”
January 16th, 2006 at 10:11 am
Does it work? I’m thinking “atmospherics” so to me “anglospherics sounds more like an Anglospheric zeitgeist. Which I like.
January 16th, 2006 at 4:06 pm
Anglospheric zeitgeist
January 17th, 2006 at 1:21 am
Not Flaubert’s? Did you see the parrot in the papers today who shopped a girl who was having an affair? Her boyfriend, named Chris, became suspicious when it started squawking “I love you, Gary!”
January 17th, 2006 at 10:04 am
Actually I saw that in the papers last night. But since they were today’s papers, yes, I did.
January 18th, 2006 at 2:08 am
The best bit was where he said he wouldn’t miss the girl but it really hurt having to get rid of the parrot. Spoken like a true Yorkshireman.